<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>UK Poverty Post &#187; Antonia Bance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oxfamblogs.org/ukpovertypost/author/antonia-bance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oxfamblogs.org/ukpovertypost</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:20:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The recession on our doorstep &#8211; BMW cut 850 jobs across the road.</title>
		<link>http://www.oxfamblogs.org/ukpovertypost/2009/02/the-recession-on-our-doorstep-bmw-cut-850-jobs-across-the-road/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oxfamblogs.org/ukpovertypost/2009/02/the-recession-on-our-doorstep-bmw-cut-850-jobs-across-the-road/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Antonia Bance</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[labourrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Antonia Bance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[migrantworkers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UKpoverty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxfamblogs.org/ukpovertypost/2009/02/the-recession-on-our-doorstep-bmw-cut-850-jobs-across-the-road/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Usually this blog is global, but today it&#8217;s intensely local too.
Because, you see, from my window here in Oxfam House I can see the Cowley car plant. The building I&#8217;m in was built on the site of the old plant, before modern technology moved it 500m to the other side of the Oxford ring road [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Usually this blog is global, but today it&#8217;s intensely local too.</p>
<p>Because, you see, from my window here in Oxfam House I can see the Cowley car plant. The building I&#8217;m in was built on the site of the old plant, before modern technology moved it 500m to the other side of the Oxford ring road and the site became a business park.</p>
<p>This morning, BMW announced that it was<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7891913.stm"> laying off</a> 850 temporary agency workers, and reallocating the permanent staff to cover a reduced shift pattern.</p>
<p>But the use of &#8220;temporary&#8221; in that sentence is misleading: these weren&#8217;t &#8220;temps&#8221; covering illness or maternity, they weren&#8217;t &#8220;temps&#8221; providing extra capacity at busy times.  They were, to all intents and purposes, permanent employees of BMW.  Many had worked there for years &#8211; two, three, five, in some cases.  A length of service that for an employee would mean that they had some measure of security in their work, and if they got laid off, they&#8217;d be entitled to some level of protection.</p>
<p>But not these workers. In the UK, temporary and agency workers can be laid off with no notice; they have few rights.  These workers are going, in the space of days, from steady &#163;250 per week jobs to <a href="http://www.oxfam.org.uk/applications/blogs/ukpp/2009/02/could_you_live_on_60_per_week.html">&#163;60 per week</a> jobseekers&#8217; allowance, with no redundancy lump sum to cushion the blow.<br />
<img alt="mini%20for%20blog.jpg" src="http://www.oxfam.org.uk/applications/blogs/ukpp/mini%20for%20blog.jpg" align="right" width="200" height="175" /><br />
<a href="http://www.oxfam.org.uk">Oxfam</a> works with poor and marginalised workers to get better labour rights all over the world.  We do so because a good job is more than income and because good labour policy is a critical part of economic development.  While wages are important, so are conditions of work &#8211; being sacked with no notice and not having sick pay, maternity pay or holiday pay can also cause poverty and vulnerability.</p>
<p>Oxfam&#8217;s been involved in successful labour rights campaigns all over the world &#8211; such as increasing the minimum wage in South Africa; winning safer factory standards in Central America; fighting off threats to make permanent workers &#8216;temporary&#8217; in Indonesia and Honduras; supporting migrants to successfully negotiate a contract for eight thousand workers in the US.</p>
<p>Here in the UK, Oxfam&#8217;s <a href="http://www.oxfam.org.uk/resources/ukpoverty/labour_rights.html">Migrant Workers Project</a> works with migrants, often agency workers, who&#8217;ve experienced exploitation in the workplace.  Recently we ran a series of workshops here in Oxford with migrant workers &#8211; including some employed at BMW &#8211; to let them know their rights at work and how to get help and advice. And, of course, we campaign for better labour rights for the 2m <a href="http://www.vulnerableworkers.org.uk/">vulnerable workers</a> in the UK.</p>
<p>In the last few years, the dictates of &#8220;labour market flexibility&#8221; and &#8220;competitiveness&#8221; have driven a move away from employing workers directly, where they can access rights fought for over decades, to employing workers through agencies, on temporary contracts. The UK has by far the <a href="http://www.pol.ed.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/9126/Scott.pdf">largest </a>temporary workers sector in the EU. Without legislation stating that agency workers must be treated equally with directly-employed workers, employers will always be tempted to cut corners on pay, terms and conditions.</p>
<p>Unions, MPs and NGOs like Oxfam have mobilised to try to get new rights for temporary workers over the last few years.  Twice, backbenchers have brought Private Members Bills to parliament demanding new rights; under pressure from campaigners the government promised <a href="http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debate/?id=2008-02-22b.680.6">in their manifesto</a> to set the problem right</a>, but have thus far<a href="http://www.berr.gov.uk/whatwedo/employment/employment-agencies/consultation-2002/page30034.html"> failed to do so</a>.</p>
<p>And that means that, today, in common with other former agency workers all over the country, 850 BMW agency workers are stood outside a jobcentre in Oxford, laid off with an hour&#8217;s notice and no redundancy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oxfamblogs.org/ukpovertypost/2009/02/the-recession-on-our-doorstep-bmw-cut-850-jobs-across-the-road/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Could you live on &#163;60 per week? And could your MP?</title>
		<link>http://www.oxfamblogs.org/ukpovertypost/2009/02/could-you-live-on-60-per-week-and-could-your-mp/</link>
		<comments>http://www.oxfamblogs.org/ukpovertypost/2009/02/could-you-live-on-60-per-week-and-could-your-mp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 13:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Antonia Bance</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[livelihoods]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UKpoverty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxfamblogs.org/ukpovertypost/2009/02/could-you-live-on-60-per-week-and-could-your-mp/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday, Tony McNulty MP, the minister for employment, admitted on BBC Radio Five Live that he couldn&#8217;t survive on the amount of money his department gives to people who are out of work.
Quoted in the Independent, he says &#8220;I don&#8217;t think I could. I&#8217;d be the first to say that.&#8221;
Currently, single people without children who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday, Tony McNulty MP, the minister for employment, <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/minister-i-couldnt-live-on-benefits-1607237.html ">admitted</a> on BBC Radio Five Live that he couldn&#8217;t survive on the amount of money his department gives to people who are out of work.</p>
<p>Quoted in the Independent, he says &#8220;I don&#8217;t think I could. I&#8217;d be the first to say that.&#8221;<br />
Currently, single people without children who are over 25 are eligible for &#163;60.50 per week in jobseekers&#8217; allowance, not including the cost of their rent or mortgage.</p>
<p>But with <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7882745.stm ">1.97m people unemployed</a> in the UK, and the number rising as the recession bites, surely it&#8217;s time to think about whether we should increase benefits.  People being made redundant now may find it hard to get back into work quickly, and the longer the time spent below the poverty line subsisting on inadequate benefits, the bigger the impact on your health, wellbeing and self-esteem.</p>
<p>When a <a href="http://www.minimumincomestandard.org/">joint project</a> between several research organisations asked 39 groups made up of members of the public of all incomes, they found that a single working age adult needs a budget of &#163;158 per week, not including housing, to get by.  This wasn&#8217;t about looking at what people wanted, but what they needed to meet their basic needs and have a chance to participate in society.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s surely what we want &#8211; people on benefits having the chance to work out how to get a new job, get some skills or get out of poverty, not people on benefits wondering how they&#8217;ll last the week, whether they can afford the bus into town to look for work or the phone call to the potential employer to see if there are vacancies.</p>
<p>In the UK, in 2009, in the teeth of an economic crisis, when people across the country are worried about their jobs, surely we all deserve the security of knowing that if the worst happens and we get made redundant, we&#8217;ll be able to get by and maintain a barely <a href="http://www.oxfam.org.uk/resources/ukpoverty/livelihoods.html">acceptable standard of living</a>.</p>
<p>So perhaps you should think &#8211; could I live on &#163;60 per week? If you couldn&#8217;t, perhaps you should <a href="http://www.writetothem.com/ ">ask your MP </a>- could they? And if not, surely it&#8217;s time to raise benefits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.oxfamblogs.org/ukpovertypost/2009/02/could-you-live-on-60-per-week-and-could-your-mp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>17</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
