<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Complexity Economics and Evolution – a Truly Big Idea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/?feed=rss2&#038;p=115" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/?p=115</link>
	<description>duncan green poverty to power oxfam development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:17:35 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ian Jones</title>
		<link>http://www.oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/?p=115&#038;cpage=1#comment-51085</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 13:12:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/?p=115#comment-51085</guid>
		<description>Duncan, I completely agree with your statement that the economic equilibrium metophor is misleading - in fact I think it is completely inappropriate. As we&#039;ve seen recently economies are a constantly changing, highly dynamic systems - interacting and responding internally and externally to factors which can not be modelled. 

@Peg (comment 4) - Indeed, we&#039;ve seen how the banks, with lax regulation and poor risk management, have set back the world economic evolution 10 years! I doubt the economists built this into their models!

Cheers,

Ian</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duncan, I completely agree with your statement that the economic equilibrium metophor is misleading &#8211; in fact I think it is completely inappropriate. As we&#8217;ve seen recently economies are a constantly changing, highly dynamic systems &#8211; interacting and responding internally and externally to factors which can not be modelled. </p>
<p>@Peg (comment 4) &#8211; Indeed, we&#8217;ve seen how the banks, with lax regulation and poor risk management, have set back the world economic evolution 10 years! I doubt the economists built this into their models!</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Ian</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peg Rack</title>
		<link>http://www.oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/?p=115&#038;cpage=1#comment-50301</link>
		<dc:creator>Peg Rack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 21:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/?p=115#comment-50301</guid>
		<description>&quot;Economic evolution is the result of three interlinked processes: Physical Technology;
Social Technology (e.g. the rule of law, money, venture capitalism) and business designs&quot;

This makes a lot of sense from wondering how this translates into the economy we&#039;ve had here in the US over the last few years since this book was written in 2006.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Economic evolution is the result of three interlinked processes: Physical Technology;<br />
Social Technology (e.g. the rule of law, money, venture capitalism) and business designs&#8221;</p>
<p>This makes a lot of sense from wondering how this translates into the economy we&#8217;ve had here in the US over the last few years since this book was written in 2006.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonas</title>
		<link>http://www.oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/?p=115&#038;cpage=1#comment-1809</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 00:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/?p=115#comment-1809</guid>
		<description>I guess Hayek&#039;s work seems closer to this view than most classical or neoclassical economics (mostly in his Law, Legislation and Liberty). It&#039;s rather unfortunate that it gets mixed with much cold-war garbage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess Hayek&#8217;s work seems closer to this view than most classical or neoclassical economics (mostly in his Law, Legislation and Liberty). It&#8217;s rather unfortunate that it gets mixed with much cold-war garbage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jo</title>
		<link>http://www.oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/?p=115&#038;cpage=1#comment-1785</link>
		<dc:creator>jo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 14:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/?p=115#comment-1785</guid>
		<description>Looking forward to hearing where this thinking takes you. I agree it could be fruitful - but only if it manages to address another achilles heel of most economic thinking, namely the absence of unpaid (unmonetised?)yet utterly essential activity without which the monetised economy could not function, let alone evolve... the caring work, the reproductive work...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looking forward to hearing where this thinking takes you. I agree it could be fruitful &#8211; but only if it manages to address another achilles heel of most economic thinking, namely the absence of unpaid (unmonetised?)yet utterly essential activity without which the monetised economy could not function, let alone evolve&#8230; the caring work, the reproductive work&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/?p=115&#038;cpage=1#comment-1779</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 12:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxfamblogs.org/fp2p/?p=115#comment-1779</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m starting graduate school in economics next year, and I think this is an absolutely fascinating area, but, like you, I think it&#039;s hard to figure out where to go with it. I look forward to reading your thoughts over the next few days.  I&#039;ve thought about reading this book before, but saw it had mixed reviews and put it aside.  I might pick it up again now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m starting graduate school in economics next year, and I think this is an absolutely fascinating area, but, like you, I think it&#8217;s hard to figure out where to go with it. I look forward to reading your thoughts over the next few days.  I&#8217;ve thought about reading this book before, but saw it had mixed reviews and put it aside.  I might pick it up again now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
