This entry was posted
on Monday, June 6th, 2011 at 9:18 am and is filed under General.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
3 Responses to “Anglo vs EU”
Leave a Reply

About this blog
This blog is written and maintained by Duncan Green, strategic adviser for Oxfam GB and author of 'From Poverty to Power'. More information on Duncan and the book is available on the From Poverty to Power official website.
It is a personal reflection by the author. It is intended to provoke debate and conversations about development, not as a comprehensive statement of Oxfam's agreed policies - for those, please take a deep breath and read the Oxfam International strategic plan or consult policy papers on a range of development issues.
Polls
Loading ...
Recent Posts
- ‘Squeezed’: how are poor people adjusting to life in a time of food price volatility?
- Aid and complex systems cont’d: timelines, incubation periods and results
- Why building ‘resilience’ matters, and needs to confront injustice and inequality
- Citizens Against Corruption: What Works? Findings from 200 projects in 53 Countries
- Will horror and over a thousand dead be a watershed moment for Bangladesh?
Recent Comments
- Tom Dickinson:Dear Duncan, This is an exc
- Aqua:It is my firm belief that corr
- Summersell:If we judge Zimbabwe's land di
- Andrew Hogg:NGO's that do more than bear w
- Corey:Although not a development org
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
-
Categories
- Aid
(456)
- Biofuels
(19)
- Book Reviews
(54)
- Climate change
(202)
- Conflict and Security
(74)
- Economics
(280)
- food and agriculture
(125)
- Gender
(71)
- General
(973)
- Global Financial and Economic Crisis
(158)
- Health and Education
(127)
- how change happens
(274)
- human rights
(53)
- Natural disasters
(65)
- NGOs
(326)
- Politics
(346)
- Poverty
(203)
- Technology
(107)
- Trade
(66)
- Aid
-
Links
- From Poverty to Power official website: Oxfam International
- ODI blog
- Global Dashboard
- FT Economists’ Forum
- Centre for Global Development
- Chris Blattman
- Oxfam GB homepage
- Oxfam International homepage
- Owen Barder
- Triple Crisis
- Dani Rodrik
- 3.5 milliones Ideas Irreverentes contra la pobreza [Spanish Speakers only]
- Africa is a Country
- Wronging Rights
- Blood and Milk
- Texas in Africa
- Writing Rights
- DueSouth (IIED blog)
- Guardian global development page
- Aid on the Edge of Chaos
- Ed Carr
- Aid Thoughts
- Politics of Poverty (Oxfam America)
- Oxfam Policy and Practice
- Evan Lieberman
- The Big Push Forward
- View from the Cave
- NYUDRI (Bill Easterly)
- 'Uncounted' – Alex Cobham, Save the Kids head of research
- Post 2015 clearing house
-

June 9th, 2011 at 3:10 pm edit
As a Brit this is so true it made me howl laughing. I only recently nearly fell out with a canadian colleague when he described something I had done as “quite good” which had me wondering what I had done wrong.
June 9th, 2011 at 6:42 pm edit
Very good, must have been a lot of fun creating it. And moving on to ‘two nations divided by a common language’ on UK/US miscomprehensions, I nearly lost a friend when I was asked, when working in New York, to come and spend some time with a problem that was ‘quite important’. I shrugged my shoulders and said I was really busy but could spare some time after lunch. My colleague was a model of froideur for the rest of the day, and I asked her what the problem was. Turned out “quite important” in American English is using an intensifier (“quite”) that is second only to “the world is about to end”, while in British English “quite important” is pretty low down the scale of world-shattering events – certainly less important than “important”.After that I treated American English as a foreign language.
June 24th, 2011 at 5:15 pm edit
this cracked me up.
they should hand these out at heathrow immigration desk.
(I’m a foreigner. it took me a while to works these out )